Hey Dad,
You and I talk about history, theology, and philosophy quite a bit, so I thought I would craft this post for you. The last three weeks, my Old Testament class has been studying the Latter Prophets. The Latter Prophets is "[t]he technical name for the collection of prophetic writings composed of the books of the three “Major” Prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel) and those of the twelve “Minor” (or shorter) Prophets, collectively called the Book of the Twelve (Bandastra)." The Latter Prophets began prophesying during the monarchy and continued through the post-exilic period. But let go of any preconceived notions about prophecy and these prophets. "The basic function of biblical prophecy was to analyze political policies and social conditions in light of Yhwh’s demands of justice, loyalty, and faith in [Yhwh] (Bandastra)."
This week, we moved into the post-exilic period and the restoration of Jerusalem. Prophets like Ezekiel and Jeremiah have writings towards the end of their books that shed hope for the Israelites who are living through the Babylonian exile. The bring messages of restoration and reconciliation.
Second Isaiah (There are really three parts of this book! Book one is chapters 1-39 and was composed of real sayings by a real Isaiah. Chapters 40-55 are from the Second Isaiah.) also wrote during this time period. He hopes for a second exodus, like the one experienced by the Israelites with Moses from Egypt. At this time in history, Cyrus and his Persian empire are in opposition to the Babylonians. We see in Isaiah's writings that the Israelites viewed Cyrus as the "great deliverer. Second Isaiah even uses the term messiah—that is, anointed one—to refer to him in order to indicate the divine initiative behind his mission:
“I am Yhwh, who made all things, . . . who says of Cyrus, ‘He is my shepherd, he shall carry out all my plans.’” Thus says Yhwh to his anointed one, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped to subjugate nations before him, . . . ‘I am Yhwh, there is no other. Except for me there is no god. I equip you, though you do not know me.’” (44:24, 28; 45:1, 5)
With eyes of faith, Second Isaiah interpreted the current events of his day as ordained and directed by Yhwh, even down to the actions of their most likely political ally at that time. Second Isaiah clearly threw his support behind Cyrus and promoted an anti-Babylonian policy. By 539 Cyrus was successful against the Babylonians (Bandastra)."
So, what's the deal here? If we know about the Davidic Covenant—that someone from the line of David would be always the be king of Israel—this doesn't make sense. What does Isaiah mean by calling Cyrus a messiah? "Second Isaiah seems to be suggesting something quite remarkable. The loving covenantal arrangement that Yhwh earlier had established with David would now be transferred to his people as a whole. The dynastic covenant would become a national covenant. The people would complete the mission begun by David. In this way, Second Isaiah is claiming that the Davidic covenant had not been annulled. Rather, it has been democratized (Bandastra)."
We talked about this some in a Google Hangout (We need to do that again soon, by the way.). First, what does it mean to be a messiah? Messiah means "anointed one." The anointed ones were the leaders of the people, usually kings. We see this in the anointing of Saul and of David by Samuel.
Can Second Isaiah make a claim that Cyrus is a messiah? Well, Cyrus was a king. He delivered the people from oppression. He even allowed for the restoration of the Temple in Jerusalem. But, like Dr. Lester said in the Hangout, "Second Isaiah greets Cyrus as the anointed, because that is the way the greeted kings! Isaiah welcomed Cyrus as the Lord and Yahweh's anointed." It's a title.
In Cyrus the Messiah by Lisbeth S. Fried, she says, "Why did the prophet Isaiah, the priests of Marduk, and the Egyptian priests bestow this honor on Cyrus? First, self-interest. These priests tied their own successes to the success of their conquerors. Second, the priests recognized that the restoration of their temples depended on the good will of the Persian leader."
Isn't this interesting? When we take away what has become the Christian understanding of "messiah", we can see the long history of titles and work of Yahweh (God) throughout history, even through an outsider of the community. Pretty cool.
Love you,
Britt